Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation ; 42(4):S305-S306, 2023.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-2256934

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 can cause severe respiratory failure, for which lung transplant (LTx) is a potentially lifesaving treatment. However, uncertainty still surrounds patient selection and timing of referral. Our study objective was to identify factors associated with recovery (weaning from ECMO and intensive care unit discharge) versus death of patients with severe COVID-19-related acute lung injury on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) listed for lung transplantation. Retrospective review of all consecutive cases referred to our center and listed for LTx between July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022. Patients were considered eligible for LTx in case they had shown no longitudinal evidence of lung recovery after at least 4 to 6 weeks had elapsed from the onset of severe COVID-19-related lung injury. Factors associated with recovery versus death were assessed. Twenty patients were included in the study: 4 underwent a LTx, 9 recovered, and 7 died. The median time from hospital admission to listing was 85.5 days [IQR 65.75, 140.25] and the median time on the transplant wait list was 25.5 days. Patients who recovered were younger (44 years [IQR 41,55] vs. 61 [IQR 49.5,65.5], P value=0.016). Time on ECMO was significantly shorter for those who recovered (59 days [IQR 53, 93] vs. 99 [IQR 83.5, 137.5], P value=0.044). Although the question regarding which patients are in a need for LTx remains unanswered, the present study informs on timing of consideration for LTx for patients with severe COVID-19-related lung injury. Based on our findings, we suggest delaying LTx consideration for 8-10 weeks from initiation of ECMO. Further, our experience demonstrates that current advances in management on ECMO allows prolonged support without significant complications in selected patients. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

2.
European Respiratory Journal Conference: European Respiratory Society International Congress, ERS ; 60(Supplement 66), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2256933

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 can cause severe respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Lung transplantation is a potentially lifesaving treatment for patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS, but uncertainty still surrounds patient selection and timing of referral. Study objective: To identify factors associated with recovery (weaning from ECMO and intensive care unit discharge) versus death of patients with covid-19-associated ARDS on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) listed for lung transplantation. Method(s): Retrospective review of all consecutive cases referred to our center and listed for lung transplantation between January and December 2021. Factors associated with recovery versus death while on the waitlist were assessed. Result(s): Sixteen patients were included in the study: 2 underwent a lung transplant, 8 recovered, and 6 died. The median time on the transplant wait list was 20 days. Patients who recovered were significantly younger (47 vs. 58) with a trajectory towards decreased time on ECMO (71.5 vs. 83.5) and a longer time interval between hospital admission and initiation of mechanical ventilation (7 vs. 2.5 days), ECMO (9 vs. 4 days) or listing for transplant (75 vs. 56.5 days). Conclusion(s): Although the question regarding which of the patients on ECMO due to COVID-19 ARDS needs lung transplant remains unanswered, it appears that younger patients are more likely to recover without transplant even after a prolonged period on ECMO.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL